Generative AI arrived in classrooms faster than any previous technology. Students use chatbots for homework, explanations and essays; teachers use them to plan lessons and create materials. Schools have moved from initial bans toward rules that try to capture the benefits while protecting learning. UNESCO published global guidance on generative AI in education and research in 2023, calling for a human-centered approach, age-appropriate use and teacher training.
How students use AI
- explaining difficult concepts in simpler terms;
- generating practice questions and checking answers;
- brainstorming and outlining essays;
- translating and language practice;
- coding help;
- and, inevitably, writing assignments for them.
The real benefits
Personal tutoring at scale. AI can explain a concept in many different ways and answer follow-up questions at any time — something one teacher with thirty students cannot do. Tools designed for education, such as Khan Academy’s Khanmigo, guide students toward answers with questions instead of giving the answer directly.
Support for diverse learners. Text-to-speech, simplified explanations, translation and step-by-step help can support students with learning differences and those studying in a second language.
Teacher time. Drafting lesson plans, differentiated worksheets, rubrics and feedback can free teachers for direct student contact.
The risks
- Skipping the learning. If AI does the thinking, students may produce good-looking work without gaining skills. Learning requires effort.
- Inaccuracy. Chatbots can confidently explain things wrongly.
- Over-reliance and reduced confidence in one’s own abilities.
- Privacy: student data entered into consumer tools.
- Equity: unequal access to paid tools and devices.
- Unreliable detection: AI-writing detectors produce false positives and should not be the basis for accusations, a concern widely raised by educators and researchers.
Rethinking assessment
Schools are adapting assignments:
- more in-class writing and oral presentations;
- assessing the process (drafts, notes, reflections), not only the product;
- assignments requiring personal experience, local context or recent class discussions;
- explicitly AI-allowed tasks where students must critique or improve AI output;
- clear labels: AI not allowed, AI allowed for brainstorming, AI allowed with disclosure.
Guidance for parents
- Ask your child to show you how they use AI and talk about when it helps or replaces learning.
- Encourage using AI as a tutor (“explain, then quiz me”) rather than an answer machine.
- Check the age requirements and privacy settings of tools.
- Support the school’s rules and ask teachers what is allowed.
Guidance for teachers
- Try the tools yourself on your own assignments.
- Set clear, written rules per assignment.
- Teach students to verify AI output and cite its use.
- Use AI to save time on preparation, not to replace your judgment about students.
Conversation starters for parents
- “Which AI tools do you use for school, and what for?”
- “Can you show me how you used it on your last assignment?”
- “What are your teacher’s rules about AI?”
- “Has it ever given you a wrong answer? How did you notice?”
- “What do you think you learn when you do it yourself instead?”
Curious, non-judgmental conversations help children use AI thoughtfully and honestly, and keep parents informed about how it affects learning.
Related reading
Related: universities and generative AI policies and what generative AI is, a simple introduction to share with students.
Bottom line
Clear rules, open conversations and assignments that value process over output help students use AI to learn rather than to avoid learning.
What to watch next
- National curriculum changes that add AI literacy.
- Education-specific AI tools with stronger privacy protections.
- Research on learning outcomes when students use AI tutors.
- School and university policies on AI use and disclosure.
Key takeaways
- Students widely use AI for explanations, practice and writing help.
- Well-designed AI tutors can personalize support; misuse can skip learning entirely.
- AI-writing detectors are unreliable and should not be the sole basis for accusations.
- Assessment is shifting toward in-class work, process and transparent AI use.
- Clear per-assignment rules help students use AI responsibly.
Frequently asked questions
Should schools ban AI?
Many early bans were lifted. Most guidance now favors clear rules, age-appropriate tools and teaching responsible use rather than blanket prohibition.
Can teachers detect AI-written work?
Not reliably with automated detectors. Knowing students’ work, assessing process and using in-class tasks are more dependable.
What age can children use AI chatbots?
Many services require users to be at least 13, often with parental consent for younger teens. Check each tool’s terms.